Resilience
Continuity fails when plans live in a PDF nobody opens until the building floods. intSignal helps you define what actually matters to the business, document recoverable priorities and owners, and run exercises that stress communications and dependencies—not only whether a server pings. Technical backup and disaster recovery proves systems can be restored; BCP ensures leadership, operations, and IT mean the same thing when they say “critical.”
We work with your risk, operations, and IT stakeholders so RTO and RPO targets, alternate work strategies, supplier contingencies, and crisis comms are consistent with how you really operate. When you also engage us for managed DR, tabletops and live tests can reference measured restore evidence instead of assumptions.
Contact Us ⟶Explore ScopeOperating model
Static pattern
The BIA is three years stale. “Critical” means everything until the budget meeting. Vendor phone trees live in someone’s notebook. The last tabletop ended in awkward silence when the scenario hit SaaS.
Living program
Impact analysis ties financial and operational pain to tiers. Plans name owners and escalation paths. Exercises surface gaps before auditors—or customers—do. IT recovery drills align to the same priorities leadership approved.
Capabilities
Modules combine based on your industry, regulatory exposure, and how distributed your workforce and suppliers are.
Facilitated workshops and quantitative or qualitative scoring so recovery tiers reflect real tolerance for outage—not every app labeled mission-critical.
Work-from-home, alternate sites, manual workarounds, and vendor failover options documented with honest constraints and costs.
Plan structure, team charters, activation criteria, and maintenance cadence—readable under stress, not only during the annual audit window.
Internal and external messaging frameworks, approval paths, and channel assumptions—including social, status pages, and helpdesk load.
Bridge from business tiers to technical recovery: which systems, which order, which evidence proves the story.
Critical vendor register, subprocessor awareness, and contract levers summarized for incident use—not buried in procurement files.
Scenario design, facilitation, injects, and after-action reports—cyber, natural disaster, key-person loss, or multi-region cloud events.
Annual calendar, metrics, training for plan owners, and integration with enterprise risk—not a one-and-done binder.
Scroll horizontally for more continuity modules →
Cyber & major incidents
BCP and incident response should not contradict each other mid-crisis.
Decision trees for isolate, restore, and communicate—aligned with security IR and legal.
Continuity of operations while forensic preservation and notifications unfold.
Workarounds when SSO or IdP recovery is on the critical path—coordinated with IAM reality.
Who speaks when facts are incomplete—without freezing the organization.
Contractual SLAs and regulatory timelines reflected in playbooks.
Criteria to stand down, retrospective, and control updates.
Use cases
Growth or new board pressure made “we will wing it” untenable—you need a baseline BIA and plan without boiling the ocean.
A real disruption exposed that the PDF plan and the war room were unrelated.
Assessors or enterprise customers ask for evidence of testing and governance.
Outcomes
Fewer surprises in incidents, faster aligned decisions, and IT investments tied to agreed recovery priorities—not loudest voice in the room.

Engagement
Stakeholders, regulatory context, existing plans, IT recovery posture, and past incidents or near-misses.
BIA refresh or build, dependency mapping, gap analysis versus target maturity.
Strategies, plan architecture, comms frameworks, and integration with DR and security runbooks.
Publish plans, train owners, establish review cycles and tooling homes (wiki, GRC, or document control).
Tabletops, joint technical drills, after-actions, and annual program calendar.
Why intSignal
Plans reference how your environment is actually run—not generic IT folklore.
Workshops that respect time and produce decisions, not endless sticky notes.
When RTO dreams exceed budget or architecture, we document the gap for leadership.
Optional single partner for both “what we restore” and “how we prove it.”
FAQ
BCP is how the organization keeps critical functions going—people, sites, suppliers, and communications. Backup and DR are how data and systems are restored. Both are needed, and they should reference the same priorities and test scenarios.
We facilitate and document; your leaders own business decisions. Scope scales from BIA and executive summaries to detailed playbooks and exercise programs.
Typically at least annually; many organizations run more frequent or rotating scenarios, coordinated with technical failover tests where appropriate.
Artifacts and exercise evidence can be aligned to common SOC 2, ISO 22301-oriented, and internal control expectations—scoped to what your assessors actually require.
When both are in scope, we align tiers, test plans, and incident handoffs so business exercises and technical restore evidence tell one story.
Share industry, regulatory drivers, geographic footprint, and current plan maturity—we will propose phased deliverables, exercise cadence, and how to link BCP to your technical recovery stack.