Infrastructure
Outages, market events, and cyber campaigns do not wait for a clean maintenance window. intSignal runs enterprise and control-support IT, MDR, and tested recovery alongside ICS and OT security alignment—covering field IoT, thermal and visible-light monitoring stacks, and governed AI where your data and regulatory model allow—so engineering, NERC CIP owners, and IT share telemetry and runbooks instead of competing narratives after the fact.
We scope with your OT security, compliance, and operations leadership: change paths that respect energization and clearance rules; identity and network paths for thermal cameras, line sensors, and gatewayed IoT so they do not become shadow admin bridges; vendor remote access that expires; and IR containment options pre-approved with control engineers—not generic “isolate the subnet” playbooks.
Contact Us ⟶See capabilitiesAlways on
Control centers, market interfaces, and field dispatch do not get a pass when ransomware hits during a heat wave. We design coverage, escalation, and documentation that match your operating calendar and regulatory cadence.
OT / CIP
segmentation, vendor access, and evidence mapped to your program boundaries
IoT
field sensors, gateways, and thermal or visual monitoring on governed network paths
MDR
correlation across IT, DMZ, authorized OT telemetry, and IoT/VMS where in scope
Operating contexts
Generation and merchant ops, transmission and distribution, and gas/water utilities—each with distinct OT and regulatory touchpoints.
Plant networks, market and scheduling interfaces, and corporate systems where a single phishing thread can pivot toward DMZ historians or EMS-adjacent tiers if segmentation drifts—alongside IoT on turbines, inverters, and balance-of-plant, and thermal programs for bearings, buswork, and hotspots.
Substations, field routers, line sensors, thermal inspection cameras (fixed or drone-fed workflows), and mobile workforce tooling with strict change discipline.
Pressure and SCADA-adjacent systems with public health and environmental visibility—often augmented by distributed IoT pressure and leak sensing and thermal surveillance of critical vaults or pump stations.
Pressures
Where programs stall
Flat networks between enterprise and plant, permanent vendor VPNs, and SOC alerts nobody maps to a BES asset or a CIP boundary. DR tests that never include EMS or market gateways.
intSignal delivery
Named ownership from corporate identity to substation handoff—with monthly artifacts your CIP program manager and CIO can trace to tickets.
Solution areas
Switch domains without leaving the page—including field IoT, thermal programs, and governed AI. Scoped to energy and utilities; formal compliance outcomes remain with your program owners.
Reliable collaboration, service desk, and endpoint operations for employees who also cover storms and market volatility—without “best effort” as the default SLA.
Execution that respects clearance, outage windows, and OEM constraints—coordinated with your OT security and engineering leads—including handoffs for sensor, thermal, and video overlays that must not bypass change control.
Utilities increasingly pair SCADA with dense IoT (line sensors, environmental probes, distributed energy resources), thermal infrared programs for hot-spot and overload detection, and AI for forecasting or anomaly review. We help secure and operate the IT side of those stacks: identity, connectivity, logging, and vendor access—without claiming control of OEM safety logic inside the energy path.
MDR, SOC, and SIEM integration with use cases for ransomware, credential theft, supplier compromise targeting energy workflows, and lateral movement from compromised IoT gateways, thermal camera management hosts, or misconfigured AI training sandboxes.
Immutable backup where policy allows, restore testing with operations at the table, and cloud placement that respects data classification and interconnect dependencies—including AI and analytics lakes fed by IoT or thermal pipelines only when your security review approves.
Outcome
Documentation of zones, conduits, and management-plane exposure your insurers and regulators increasingly reference.
OEM and integrator access tied to work orders and expiration—not forgotten VPN profiles.
Scaled helpdesk, comms bridges, and security monitoring during named events and market stress.
Correlation that respects asset criticality and BES relevance when you authorize that mapping—including IoT and thermal / VMS telemetry forwarded on approved conduits.
Restore ordering and tests that include EMS, OMS, or market gateways per your runbooks.
Phishing-resistant patterns and safe collaboration for plant and corporate staff.
Assurance
We do not certify your CIP program or sign your attestation—but we can operate to the technical bar you set and supply structured evidence.
CAB notes, approvals, and privileged session records suitable for internal and external review.
Risk acceptance documentation when deferrals align with OT windows you own.
Containment steps coordinated with engineering and documented for legal and regulatory follow-up.
Test results tied to systems and RTO tiers in your BCP—not generic “backup OK” screenshots.
Vendor inventory and review cadence aligned with procurement—not orphaned spreadsheets.
Logging gaps called out with owners and dates—including IoT gateways, thermal and video management planes, and AI training or inference hosts—so the next audit is not the first time leadership sees blind spots.
Engagement
From assessment through run-state—with gates your operations and cyber programs can inspect.
Critical assets, CIP or equivalent boundaries, vendor map, IoT and thermal / VMS footprint, AI workloads and data flows, prior incidents, and logging posture.
Joint IT–OT backlog: identity sprawl, segmentation gaps, SOC blind spots, DR gaps.
Execute in approved windows; tune detection; validate backups with operations present.
MSP/MDR steady state with monthly reporting mapped to themes your program office tracks.
Regulators & insurers
When an incident touches both IT and OT, boards and regulators ask for timelines, decisions, and ownership—not tool logos. We maintain documentation and bridge discipline so your general counsel, CIP lead, and CIO tell one coherent story.
Outcomes
Predictable patching and change windows with rollback tested before you announce maintenance to the ISO or your members.
Security and operations correlated on the same asset context—when you authorize that linkage.
Coverage for storms, market events, and hiring freezes without burning out internal staff.
Time-bound remote sessions with audit trails that survive post-incident review.
FAQ
No. NERC CIP compliance and registration outcomes are owned by your registered entity and program management. We deliver technical and operational services—patching, logging, access reviews, MDR, backup testing, and documentation—mapped to tasks your compliance office defines in the SOW.
When contract, clearance, and network access models permit, we execute scoped tasks under your policies—often via jump hosts, monitored sessions, and separation of duties you approve. Air-gapped or sovereign environments may limit remote delivery; we document constraints up front.
Containment options are pre-reviewed with your OT security and engineering leads—not improvised IR scripts. We follow your cyber–physical IR plan for energization, safe states, and restoration sequencing.
We support enterprise IT, connectivity, security operations, and governance for portfolios that include wind, solar, and storage—scoped to your asset hierarchy and telemetry model. Site-level OEM contracts may still govern certain devices.
We map them to your program boundaries: network placement, identity, logging, patch ownership, and vendor remote access—coordinated with OT security and engineering. We do not reclassify BES assets or sign CIP attestations; we execute technical controls and evidence tasks your compliance office assigns in the SOW.
When policy, contracts, and segmentation allow, yes—typically starting with forecasting, IoT analytics, or human-in-the-loop review of model outputs. Air-gapped or highly restricted environments may require on-prem inference or narrow pilot scope; we document constraints and data residency up front.
Share asset classes, approximate site and user counts, primary compliance frameworks, and OT security model. We respond with a proposed service map, RACI, and commercial approach.